Benson, Marge (author / J. Walter Thompson Company)
Format:
Paper
Publication Date:
1985-04
Published:
USA: AgEcon
Location:
Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 30 Document Number: D10574
Notes:
3 pages., Via proceedings from a seminar, "Research on effectiveness of agricultural commodity promotion," of NECC-63 Research Committee on Commodity Promotion, Arlington, Virginia, April 9-10, 1985., Research is vital as communication planning "incorporates the consumer point of view throughout."
USA: Economic Research Service, U.S Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
Location:
Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 30 Document Number: D10576
Notes:
37 pages., ERS staff report - No. AGEX831007. Also available online from Hathi Trust Digital Library., via library catalog., Food manufacturers spent $7 billion in advertising in 1997. Most of
this advertising focused on highly processed and highly packaged
foodswhich also tend to be the foods consumed in large quantities
in the United States relative to Federal dietary recommendations
such as the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Advertising expenditures on meat, fruits, and vegetables are negligible. In contrast, the
U.S. Department of Agriculture spent $333.3 million on nutrition
education, evaluation, and demonstrations. This is approximately
what the food industry spent on advertising just for coffee, tea, and
cocoa, or for snacks and nuts; slightly more than half (60 percent)
the amount spent on advertising for carbonated soft drinks, and less
than half the amount spent promoting beer, or candy and gum, or
breakfast cereals.
Findings suggested that in-store point-of-purchase advertising was not sufficient to significantly increase brand awareness and total demand for local ornamental brands. Buying frequency was found to increase both overall demand and likelihood of brand awareness.
