This committee report examines relationships between extension communicators at the state level with local extension agents in providing news to mass media.
Read, Hadley (author / University of Illinois) and University of Illinois
Format:
Report
Publication Date:
1974
Published:
USA
Location:
Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 10 Document Number: B01400
Notes:
Evans; AgComm teaching. Claude W. Gifford Collection., 3 copies; Urbana, IL : Office of Agricultural Communications, University of Illinois, 1974. 54 p.
Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 48 Document Number: C00053
Notes:
This report is from a larger project file maintained by the Agricultural Communications Program, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign > "International" section > "Jordan Project" file. The project file includes correspondence, agenda, teaching resources, participant projects, and other related materials., Urbana, IL: Agency for International Development Projects, Extension Editorial Office, College of Agriculture, University of Illinois. 27pp.
Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 116 Document Number: C11848
Journal Title Details:
pp. 46-48
Notes:
Presentation at The Fifth Annual Conferences of The American Association of Agricultural College Editors at Ithaca, NY, June 28-29, 1917, Proceedings of The Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Annual Conferences of The American Association of Agricultural College Editors by Subject Term(s)
Agricultural Communicators in Education (ACE) in 1919
Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 145 Document Number: D06553
Notes:
Online via Ovid.com. Abstract of dissertation for PhD from the University of Idaho. 1 page., Responding department heads reported no difficulty in recruiting and retaining agricultural communicators. No geographic pattern was apparent in difficulty of recruiting. Tenure was perceived not necessary for agricultural communicators to interact successfully with faculty in academic units. There was no strong support for tenure within agricultural communication departments by department heads.