« Previous |
11 - 16 of 16
|
Next »
Number of results to display per page
Search Results
12. Social media influencer marketing and children’s food intake: A randomized trial
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Contributers:
- Coates, Anna E. (author), Hardman, Charlotte A. (author), Halford, Jason C. G. (author), Christiansen, Paul (author), and Boyland, Emma J. (author)
- Format:
- Journal article
- Publication Date:
- 2019-03
- Published:
- American Academy of Pediatrics
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 7 Document Number: D10248
- Journal Title:
- Pediatrics
- Journal Title Details:
- 143(4)
- Notes:
- 11 pages., Via online journal article, OBJECTIVES: To examine the impact of social media influencer marketing of foods (healthy and unhealthy) on children’s food intake. METHODS: In a between-subjects design, 176 children (9–11 years, mean 10.5 ± 0.7 years) were randomly assigned to view mock Instagram profiles of 2 popular YouTube video bloggers (influencers). Profiles featured images of the influencers with unhealthy snacks (participants: n = 58), healthy snacks (n = 59), or nonfood products (n = 59). Subsequently, participants’ ad libitum intake of unhealthy snacks, healthy snacks, and overall intake (combined intake of healthy and unhealthy snacks) were measured. RESULTS: Children who viewed influencers with unhealthy snacks had significantly increased overall intake (448.3 kilocalories [kcals]; P = .001), and significantly increased intake of unhealthy snacks specifically (388.8 kcals; P = .001), compared with children who viewed influencers with nonfood products (357.1 and 292.2 kcals, respectively). Viewing influencers with healthy snacks did not significantly affect intake. CONCLUSIONS: Popular social media influencer promotion of food affects children’s food intake. Influencer marketing of unhealthy foods increased children’s immediate food intake, whereas the equivalent marketing of healthy foods had no effect. Increasing the promotion of healthy foods on social media may not be an effective strategy to encourage healthy dietary behaviors in children. More research is needed to understand the impact of digital food marketing and inform appropriate policy action.
13. Somewhere over the rainbow: cooking a Slovenian path to a "better" future
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Contributers:
- Kamin, Tanja (author), Vezovnik, Andreja (author), and Japelj, Pavlina (author)
- Format:
- Book chapter
- Publication Date:
- 2017
- Published:
- International
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 6 Document Number: D10204
- Notes:
- Pages 222-239 in Oliver Vodeb (ed), Food democracy: critical lessons in food communication, design and art. Intellect: Bristol, UK. 553 pages.
14. The family mealtime study: parent socialization and context during family meals
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Contributers:
- Kok, Car Mun (author), Torquati, Julia (author), and De Guzman, Maria (author)
- Format:
- Online journal article
- Publication Date:
- 2019-06
- Published:
- Extension Journal, Inc.
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 32 Document Number: D10608
- Journal Title:
- Journal of Extension
- Journal Title Details:
- 57(3)
- Notes:
- 16 pages., Article #:3RIB3, via online journal., Research on the family mealtime has shown its importance for youths' dietary attitudes and behaviors. Youths who have more frequent family meals often have more healthful dietary behaviors. However, little is known about the context and processes related to how family mealtimes affect youths' dietary behaviors. To address this gap, we examined the context of family mealtimes and parent socialization that occurs during family meals through mealtime observations and interviews. Family mealtimes are valued by parents, and our findings can be useful to Extension professionals in educating parents and families regarding shaping of family mealtimes, feeding strategies, and nutrition.
15. The global meat autocracy: an issue of social injustice: cartelization of the global meat industry
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Contributers:
- Toplak, Cirila (author)
- Format:
- Book chapter
- Publication Date:
- 2017
- Published:
- International
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 6 Document Number: D10203
- Notes:
- Pages 52-77 in Oliver Vodeb (ed), Food democracy: critical lessons in food communication, design and art. Intellect: Bristol, UK. 553 pages.
16. Where do U.S. households purchase healthy foods? An analysis of food-at-home purchases across different types of retailers in a nationally representative dataset
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Contributers:
- Chrisinger, Benjamin W (author), Kallan, Michael J. (author), Whiteman, Eliza D. (author), Hillier, Amy (author), and Standford University University of Pennsylvania
- Format:
- Online journal article
- Publication Date:
- 2018-03-16
- Published:
- United States: Elsevier
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 133 Document Number: D11387
- Journal Title:
- Preventative Medicine
- Journal Title Details:
- 112(2018) : 15-22
- Notes:
- 7 pages., via online journal, Food shopping decisions are pathways between food environment, diet and health outcomes, including chronic diseases such as diabetes and obesity. The choices of where to shop and what to buy are interrelated, though a better understanding of this dynamic is needed. The U.S. Department of Agriculture's nationally representative Food Acquisitions and Purchase Survey food-at-home dataset was joined with other databases of retailer characteristics and Healthy Eating Index-2010 (HEI) of purchases. We used linear regression models with general estimating equations to assess relationships between trip, store, and shopper characteristics with trip HEI scores. We examined HEI component scores for conventional supermarkets and discount/limited assortment retailers with descriptive statistics. Overall, 4962 shoppers made 11,472 shopping trips over one-week periods, 2012–2013. Trips to conventional supermarkets were the most common (53.6%), followed by supercenters (18.6%). Compared to conventional supermarkets, purchases at natural/gourmet stores had significantly higher HEI scores (β = 6.48, 95% CI = [4.45, 8.51], while those from “other” retailers (including corner and convenience stores) were significantly lower (−3.89, [−5.87, −1.92]). Older participants (versus younger) and women (versus men) made significantly healthier purchases (1.19, [0.29, 2.10]). Shoppers with less than some college education made significantly less-healthy purchases, versus shoppers with more education, as did households participating in SNAP, versus those with incomes above 185% of the Federal Poverty Level. Individual, trip, and store characteristics influenced the healthfulness of foods purchased. Interventions to encourage healthy purchasing should reflect these dynamics in terms of how, where, and for whom they are implemented.