1 - 5 of 5
Number of results to display per page
Search Results
2. Corporate communication actions in response to crises: empirical evidence in food fraud in Brazil
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Contributers:
- Florencio de Almeida, Luciana (author), Valeria Rocha, Thelma (author), and Ribeiro da Fonseca, Marcio (author)
- Format:
- Journal article
- Publication Date:
- 2019
- Published:
- Brazil
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 121 Document Number: D11088
- Journal Title:
- International Journal on Food System Dynamics
- Journal Title Details:
- 10(5) : 458-472
- Notes:
- Available online at www.centmapress.org, Results indicated that both corporate firms involved in a food fraud case lacked an immediate mandate to address the legitimate stakeholders' claim. "This study adds the action perspective to stakeholder salience theory, providing practical guidelines for marketers in the food sector who face wicked contexts, attempting to achieve transparency and common goals along with their stakeholders."
3. If the stud's a dud and other horse tales: mediation of equine law disputes may be your best bet
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Contributers:
- Marcus, Jeffrey H. (author) and Blitman, Bruce A. (author)
- Format:
- Journal article
- Publication Date:
- 2019
- Published:
- USA
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 140 Document Number: D11523
- Journal Title:
- Florida Bar Journal
- Journal Title Details:
- 93(5) : 46-49
- Notes:
- 5 pages., Online via UI Catalog. September-October issue., Authors described types of legal disputes in the equine industry, addressed why and when to use mediation, and offered suggestions on mediation methods.
4. Investigating gaps in perception of wildlife between urban and rural inhabitants: empirical evidence from Japan
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Contributers:
- Kato, Eri (author), Yano, Yuki (author), and Ohe, Yasuo (author)
- Format:
- Journal article
- Publication Date:
- 2019
- Published:
- Japan
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 133 Document Number: D11371
- Journal Title:
- Sustainability
- Journal Title Details:
- 11 : 4516
- Notes:
- 13 pages., Online via Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). 13 pages., Results of an online survey indicated that urban respondents did not have a comprehensive understanding of wildlife and any positive views were primarily abstract. Conversely, rural individuals had diverse perceptions, both positive and negative.
5. What farmer types are most likely to adopt joint venture farm business structures?
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Contributers:
- Kragt, Marit E. (author), Lynch, Brendan (author), Llewellyn, Rick S. (author), and Umberger, Wendy J. (author)
- Format:
- Journal article
- Publication Date:
- 2019-08-14
- Published:
- Australia: Australasian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society Inc.
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Document Number: D12522
- Journal Title:
- The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
- Journal Title Details:
- V. 63, Iss. 4
- Notes:
- 16pgs, Joint venture (JV) farm structures have the potential to increase the productivity and profitability of traditional family farms. However, such structures are not widely adopted within the farm business community. Furthermore, knowledge on the relative attractiveness of different JV models to farmers is limited. We use a choice experiment to explore what JV structures are preferred by Australian farmers, and how farmers’ socio-demographic and attitudinal characteristics influence the type of JV structure preferred. A latent class analysis revealed significant unobserved preference heterogeneity amongst the population. We identify four latent classes that differ in their preferences regarding the number of JV partners, access to new machinery, and/or the opportunity for additional annual leave. All classes of farmers displayed positive preferences for operational decision-making with other JV partners, although they varied in their preferences towards final operational responsibility. The diversity in preferences shows that there is no ‘one size fits all’ JV design, leaving opportunities for a range of JV decision models. Such flexibility in JV design is likely to have advantages when seeking JV partners, with a significant proportion of the sampled population open to collaborative decision-making models.