Search

    Start Over Publication Year 2005 Subject Term consumer attitudes Subject Term public attitudes

    3. An empirical analysis of United States consumers' concerns about eight food production and processing technologies

    <span class="translation_missing" title="translation missing: en.bibleaves.discover_item">Discover Item</span>
    Collection:
    Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
    Contributers:
    Teisl, Mario F. (author), Roe, Brian (author), and Hwang, Yun-Jae (author)
    Format:
    Journal article
    Publication Date:
    2005
    Published:
    USA
    Location:
    Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 165 Document Number: C27577
    Journal Title:
    AgBioForum
    Journal Title Details:
    8(1) : 40-49
    Notes:
    Electronic journal

    4. Comparison of consumer perceptions and preference toward organic versus conventionally produced foods: a review and update of the literature

    <span class="translation_missing" title="translation missing: en.bibleaves.discover_item">Discover Item</span>
    Collection:
    Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
    Contributers:
    Yiridoe, E.K. (author), Bonti-Ankomah, S. (author), and Martin, R.C. (author)
    Format:
    Journal article
    Publication Date:
    2005
    Published:
    USA
    Location:
    Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Document Number: C27576
    Journal Title:
    Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems
    Journal Title Details:
    20(4) : 193-205

    6. Consumer perceptions of meat production: enhancing the competitiveness of British agriculture by understanding communication with the consumer

    <span class="translation_missing" title="translation missing: en.bibleaves.discover_item">Discover Item</span>
    Collection:
    Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
    Contributers:
    Mceachern, M.G. (author) and Seaman, C. (author)
    Format:
    Abstract
    Publication Date:
    2005
    Published:
    UK
    Location:
    Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 161 Document Number: C26517
    Journal Title:
    British Food Journal
    Journal Title Details:
    107(8) : 572-593
    Notes:
    Via ISIknowledge.com

    8. Digesting public opinion

    <span class="translation_missing" title="translation missing: en.bibleaves.discover_item">Discover Item</span>
    Collection:
    Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
    Contributers:
    Bostrom, Meg (author)
    Format:
    Report
    Publication Date:
    2005-09-06
    Published:
    USA
    Location:
    Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Document Number: C27581
    Notes:
    Posted at http://www.wkkf.org, Pages 1-30 in Perceptions of the U.S. food system: what and how Americans think about their food. W.K. Kellogg Foundation, Battle Creek, Michigan. 88 pages.

    9. Do people value the welfare of farm animals?

    <span class="translation_missing" title="translation missing: en.bibleaves.discover_item">Discover Item</span>
    Collection:
    Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
    Contributers:
    Burgess, Diane (author) and Hutchinson, W. George (author)
    Format:
    Abstract
    Publication Date:
    2005-11
    Published:
    United Kingdom
    Location:
    Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 154 Document Number: C25047
    Journal Title:
    EuroChoices
    Journal Title Details:
    4(3) : 36-43
    Notes:
    Abstract from UI electronic subscription., Authors use contingent valuation to determine the economic value of improving the welfare of farm animals and find that people are willing to pay extra on their weekly food bill to ensure that laying hens, broiler chickens, dairy cows and pigs have improved welfare conditions. "The benefits of improving animal welfare are shown to exceed the costs of implementing these schemes. We conclude that improving the standards of legislation for farm animal welfare so that all farm animals experience higher standards of welfare can be economically justified."