« Previous |
1 - 10 of 33
|
Next »
Number of results to display per page
Search Results
2. A website content analysis of corporate animal welfare messaging
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Contributers:
- Morris, Olivia (author), Miller, Jefferson D. (author), and Whitehead, Isabel (author)
- Format:
- Journal article
- Publication Date:
- 2019-11
- Published:
- Association for Communication Excellence
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 121 Document Number: D11053
- Journal Title:
- Journal of Applied Communications
- Journal Title Details:
- 103(4)
- Notes:
- via online journal., The purpose of this study was to identify and describe the nature of corporate positions on animal welfare available on the websites of five meat producing companies in the U.S. The results of the content analysis illustrated that there were common topics among the dialogs the companies were willing to open related to their animal welfare positions. The companies typically took a general approach to animal welfare topics, commonly focusing on their corporate policy and their commitment to animal welfare. While each company focused on a unique combination of topics, companies commonly avoided mentioning more specific and possibly controversial topics and instead chose to focus on big-picture topics such as a commitment to sound animal welfarepractices. Each company used a particular set of frames to couch individual animal welfare messages for consumers. The most common frame led was that the company is an industry leader in animal welfare. Eighteen thematic terms related to livestock production and handling emerged through the content analysis. Of those, animal handling and humane were clearly the most commonly used terms. Future research should include matching these content analysis results with the existing communication strategies of each company, conducting more content analyses on animal protein companies’ other media outlets, as well as further exploring the presence of frames, topics, and terminology in news coverage in comparison to the online messages of animal protein companies.
3. Are you listening? What consumers tell us about dietary recommendations
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Format:
- Newsletter
- Publication Date:
- 1999-09
- Published:
- USA
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 110 Document Number: C10571
- Journal Title Details:
- 3 pages
- Notes:
- September/October 1998 Food Insight, International Food Information Council, Washington, D.C.
4. Attention, access and the global space of interpretation: media dynamics of the IPCC AR5 launch year
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Contributers:
- Kunelius, Risto (author) and Yagodin, Dmitry (author)
- Format:
- Book chapter
- Publication Date:
- 2017
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Document Number: D08850
- Notes:
- Pages 59-80 in Kunelius, Risto Eide, Elisabeth Tegelberg, Matthew Yagodin, Dmitry (eds.), Media and global climate knowledge: journalism and the IPCC. United States: Palgrave Macmillan, New York City, New York. 309 pages.
5. Best practices in environmental communication: a case study of Louisiana's coastal crisis
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Contributers:
- Jarreau, Paige Brown (author), Altinay, Zeynep (author), and Reynolds, Amy (author)
- Format:
- Journal article
- Publication Date:
- 2015-10-30
- Published:
- USA: Taylor & Francis Group Ltd., 2 Park Square Oxford OX14 4RN United Kingdom
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 165 Document Number: D08354
- Journal Title:
- Environmental Communication
- Journal Title Details:
- 11 (2): 143-165
6. Camp focuses on farm safety
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Contributers:
- Stone, Kelly (author / McClatchey - Tribune Business News)
- Format:
- News article
- Publication Date:
- 2006-08-08
- Published:
- USA
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 197 Document Number: D09482
- Notes:
- Online via ProQuest. 2 pages.
7. Communication- A key to agribusiness success
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Contributers:
- Hagiu, Alina (author) and Bărbulescu, Marinela (author)
- Format:
- Journal article
- Publication Date:
- 2014
- Published:
- Romania: Banat University of Agriculture Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Timisoara
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 158 Document Number: D07549
- Journal Title:
- Agricultural Management
- Journal Title Details:
- 16 (2): 53-58
8. Consumers' Evaluations of Genetically Modified Food Messages
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Contributers:
- Rumble, Joy N. (author), Ruth, Taylor K. (author), and University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign The Ohio State University
- Format:
- Journal article
- Publication Date:
- 2019
- Published:
- United States: New Prairie Press
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 7 Document Number: D10235
- Journal Title:
- Journal of Applied Communications
- Journal Title Details:
- 103(1)
- Notes:
- 20 pages., Via online journal., Consumers are concerned about the risks related to genetically modified (GM) food, and there is a need for agricultural communicators and educators to address those concerns. The purpose of this study was to explore Florida residents’ latitudes of acceptance, rejection, and noncommitment toward GM food messages. The findings from this study can be used to guide communication and education campaigns for GM food. An online survey was distributed to a non-probability sample of 500 Florida residents to fulfill the purpose of the study. The messages that most aligned with the respondents’ views toward GM food discussed how potential risks related to human health had not been adequately investigated and that GM food may be riskier to consume compared to traditional food. The messages that most opposed the respondents’ views were that GM food was safe for consumption and that it caused cancer in humans. People whose views most aligned with the message that GM food caused cancer in humans had the largest latitude of rejection, likely due to their extreme attitude, confirmation bias, and ego-involvement. The largest percentage of respondents accepted messages that aligned with their position but expressed noncommitment to messages that opposed their views. This lack of rejection and indication of alignment with messages related to potential risk and uncertainty indicated Florida consumers were unsure about the effects of GM food. Communicators and educators should acknowledge these concerns when delivering information about GM food to enhance the effectiveness of communication with consumers.
9. Crisis management and how to be prepared
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Contributers:
- Bland, Jessie (author)
- Format:
- Journal article
- Publication Date:
- 2018-02-08
- Published:
- USA: AAEA - The Agricultural Communicators Network, LaGrange, GA.
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Document Number: D09356
- Journal Title:
- AAEA ByLine
- Notes:
- Online issue. 4 pages.
10. Determining the effects of evidence-based messaging on millennial agriculturalists' attitudes towards genetically modified (GM) foods
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Contributers:
- Ballmer, Erica M. (author) and Purdue University
- Format:
- Thesis
- Publication Date:
- 2018-01-01
- Published:
- Ann Arbor: ProQuest
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 18 Document Number: D10474
- Notes:
- 126 pages., ISBN: 9780438013049, Via ProQuest Dissertations and Theses., Genetically modified foods and crops are a topic of heated debate in the United States. As with all issues, messaging has the potential to influence and change an individual’s attitude. Through the lens of social judgment theory, this quasi-experimental study investigated the influence of an evidence-based message on millennial agricultural students’ attitudes towards genetically modified foods and crops, while taking into account participants’ ego-involvements for the issue. Sixty-nine undergraduate students in the College of Agriculture participated in this study – comprised of a pre-test and post-test questionnaire with an evidence-based message intervention between. The major finding from this study was that for the issue of genetically modified foods, millennial agricultural students’ with high ego-involvement are capable of attitude change and moving their anchor points in the direction of viewing genetically modified foods and crops less favorably than prior to the evidence-based message intervention. This result was unexpected, but important. Another key finding is that the majority of millennial agricultural students reported holding favorable attitudes towards genetically modified foods. In regards to the risks of genetically modified foods, the majority of participants disagreed that there is any risk associated with eating genetically modified foods and were neutral towards any environmental risks of genetically modified crops. This study also investigated the role of ego-involvement and the widths of the latitudes of acceptance, noncommitment, and rejection. While there was a trend for the latitude of acceptance to increase and for the latitude of rejection to decrease for both the high and low ego-involvement groups, these findings were insignificant. Overall, this study’s findings provides great insight to science communicators who are messaging with the goal of influencing attitude change. Utilizing key elements of science communication including, weight of evidence reporting, weight of experts reporting, reinforcement of self-identity, credibility, valence, and framing theory, it is possible to influence attitude change, at least for millennial agricultural students with high ego-involvement for the issue of genetically modified foods. Future research should expand to include other segments of the population, as well as other science issues.
- « Previous
- Next »
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4