« Previous |
1 - 10 of 11
|
Next »
Number of results to display per page
Search Results
2. Brands are key to regenerative agriculture
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Contributers:
- Pierce, Eric (author)
- Format:
- Online article
- Publication Date:
- 2017-11-22
- Published:
- New Hope Network
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 209 Document Number: D13482
- Notes:
- 3 pages
3. Can regenerative agriculture increase national soil carbon stocks? Simulated country-scale adoption of reduced tillage, cover cropping, and ley-arable integration using RothC
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Contributers:
- Jordon, Matthew W. (author), Smith, Pete (author), Long, Peter R. (author), Bürkner, Paul-Christian (author), Petrokofsky, Gillian (author), and Willis, Kathy J. (author)
- Format:
- Journal article
- Publication Date:
- 2022-02-19
- Published:
- Interational: Elsevier
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 209 Document Number: D13485
- Journal Title:
- Science of The Total Environment
- Journal Title Details:
- 825 : 153955
- Notes:
- 9 pages, Adopting Regenerative Agriculture (RA) practices on temperate arable land can increase soil organic carbon (SOC) concentration without reducing crop yields. RA is therefore receiving much attention as a climate change mitigation strategy. However, estimating the potential change in national soil carbon stocks following adoption of RA practices is required to determine its suitability for this. Here, we use a well-validated model of soil carbon turnover (RothC) to simulate adoption of three regenerative practices (cover cropping, reduced tillage intensity and incorporation of a grass-based ley phase into arable rotations) across arable land in Great Britain (GB). We develop a modelling framework which calibrates RothC using studies of these measures from a recent systematic review, estimating the proportional increase in carbon inputs to the soil compared to conventional practice, before simulating adoption across GB. We find that cover cropping would on average increase SOC stocks by 10 t·ha−1 within 30 years of adoption across GB, potentially sequestering 6.5 megatonnes of carbon dioxide per year (MtCO2·y−1). Ley-arable systems could increase SOC stocks by 3 or 16 t·ha−1, potentially providing 2.2 or 10.6 MtCO2·y−1 of sequestration over 30 years, depending on the length of the ley-phase (one and four years, respectively, in these scenarios). In contrast, our modelling approach finds little change in soil carbon stocks when practising reduced tillage intensity. Our results indicate that adopting RA practices could make a meaningful contribution to GB agriculture reaching net zero greenhouse gas emissions despite practical constraints to their uptake.
4. Education for sustainability in the agriculture and livestock sector: educational experience in Gibraltar area (Spain)
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Contributers:
- Casanova-Correa, Juan (author), Vargas-Vergara, Montserrat (author), Aragon, Lourdes (author), and Gomez-Chacon, Beatriz (author)
- Format:
- Journal
- Publication Date:
- 2022-06
- Published:
- Sciendo
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 209 Document Number: D13383
- Journal Title:
- Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education
- Journal Title Details:
- 13(1) : 5-16
- Notes:
- 12 pages, If we are to attain a sustainable future, humanity will need to make drastic changes towards a life based on sustainability in all areas, especially in the economic sector, including food production. The task of educating for sustainability needs to include food producers (farmers and livestock breeders). This article describes an educational experience carried out within the framework of a proposal presented in the “Second Call for Grants to Promote University-Company Projects” at the Technological Campus of Algeciras (Spain). It consisted of conducting in-depth interviews with farmers and livestock breeders, identifying the practices in the daily management of their farms, and having them participate in an education and training event in which they shared their knowledge. It was not an easy task because food producers have systematically been attacked by currents of opinion that blame them for causing greenhouse gas emissions. We adopted an approach based on empathy and on encouraging sustainable food production practices.
5. Local challenges and successes associated with transitioning to sustainable food system practices for a Australian context: multi-sector stakeholder perceptions
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Contributers:
- Sambell, Ros (author), Andrew, Lesley (author), Godrich, Stephanie (author), Wolfgang, Justin (author), Vandenbroeck, Dieter (author), Stubley, Katie (author), Rose, Nick (author), Newman, Lenore (author), Horwitz, Pierre (author), and Devine, Amanda (author)
- Format:
- Journal article
- Publication Date:
- 2019-06-10
- Published:
- International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health: MDPI
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 209 Document Number: D13478
- Journal Title:
- Switzerland
- Journal Title Details:
- 16(11) : 2051
- Notes:
- 16 pages, Large-scale food system practices have diminished soil and water quality and negatively impacted climate change. Yet, numerous opportunities exist to harness food system practices that will ensure better outcomes for human health and ecosystems. The objective of this study was to consider food Production, Processing, Access and Consumption domains, and for each determine the challenges and successes associated with progressing towards a sustainable food system. A workshop engaging 122 participants including producers, consultants, consumers, educators, funders, scientists, media, government and industry representatives, was conducted in Perth, Western Australia. A thematic analysis of statements (Successes (n = 170) or Challenges (n = 360)) captured, revealed issues of scale, knowledge and education, economics, consumerism, big food, environmental/sustainability, communication, policies and legislation, and technology and innovations. Policy recommendations included greater investment into research in sustainable agriculture (particularly the evidentiary basis for regenerative agriculture), land preservation, and supporting farmers to overcome high infrastructure costs and absorb labour costs. Policy, practice and research recommendations included focusing on an integrated food systems approach with multiple goals, food system actors working collaboratively to reduce challenges and undertaking more research to further the regenerative agriculture evidence.
6. Novel approaches and practices to sustainable agriculture
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Contributers:
- Muhie, Seid Hussen (author)
- Format:
- Journal article
- Publication Date:
- 2022-11-08
- Published:
- Netherlands: Elsevier B.V.
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 206 Document Number: D12804
- Journal Title:
- Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
- Journal Title Details:
- Vol. 10
- Notes:
- 11 pages, The world population is increasing in a disquieting rate while the quantity of food to gratify this snowballing human population is an annoyance to agrarian scientists and policymakers around the globe. Today's population is snatching natural resources from the future which can endanger the future generation's right to have nutritious food and clean air. The causes for this challenge can be enumerated and listed out, but singled out as lack of and/or poor implementation of novel approaches and practices for sustainable agriculture. Some of the novel approaches are but not limited to climate smart agriculture (CSA), organic farming, biodynamic agriculture, sustainable intensification and regenerative agriculture; and novel practices as integrated farming system (IFS), precision agriculture, integrated nutrient management (INM) and integrated pest management (IPM). The adoption of these approaches and practices has been proven to safeguard agricultural sustainability.
7. Orthodox soil science versus alternative philosophies: a clash of cultures in a modern context
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Contributers:
- White, Robert E (author) and Andrew, Martin (author)
- Format:
- Journal article
- Publication Date:
- 2019-05-23
- Published:
- Switzerland: MDPI
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 209 Document Number: D13386
- Journal Title:
- Sustainability
- Journal Title Details:
- 11(10) : 2919
- Notes:
- 6 pages, In Australia, orthodox soil scientists dealing with land management and alternative practitioners who promote ‘regenerative agriculture’ have not been communicating and engaging effectively with each other. Over many years, scientists in the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO), state departments and universities have made significant achievements in mapping soil distribution, describing soil behaviour and identifying key soil properties and processes that are fundamental to healthy soil function. However, many alternative practitioners are dismissive of these achievements and highly critical of orthodox soil science. Yet many of the tools of soil science are essential to conduct evidence-based research towards elucidating how and why the exceptional results claimed by some alternative practitioners are achieved. We stress the importance of effective engagement and communication among all parties to resolve this ‘clash of cultures’.
8. Regenerative agriculture and implications for agriculture, food, and natural resources education
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Contributers:
- Raven, Matt R. (author)
- Format:
- Journal article
- Publication Date:
- 2020-03-28
- Published:
- USA: PKP Publishing Services
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 208 Document Number: D13301
- Journal Title:
- Journal of Agricultural Education
- Journal Title Details:
- 61(1) : 1–12
- Notes:
- 12 pages, The article discusses the importance of regenerative agriculture and its implications for education within agriculture, food, and natural resources sectors. The document highlights how regenerative agriculture focuses on restoring ecosystem processes, such as improving soil health, increasing biodiversity, and enhancing water retention, while also promoting more sustainable agricultural practices. It also touches upon the challenges faced by conventional agricultural systems, including the loss of soil health and vulnerability to climate change, while advocating for interdisciplinary approaches to teaching and research. The document encourages a shift from industrialized agriculture towards systems that work with nature, offering examples of successful regenerative agricultural practices, both in the U.S. and globally.
9. Socioeconomic factors influencing uptake of regenerative agriculture technologies in the drylands of Embu County, Kenya
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Contributers:
- Otara, Elvin (author), Rasugu, Hezron Mogaka (author), Ndirangu, Samuel (author), and Mugwe, Jayne Njeri (author)
- Format:
- Journal article
- Publication Date:
- 2023-01-30
- Published:
- Nigeria: Agricultural Extension Society of Nigeria
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 206 Document Number: D12795
- Journal Title:
- Journal of Agricultural Extension
- Journal Title Details:
- Vol. 27, N.1
- Notes:
- 12 pages, This study evaluated socioeconomic factors influencing the uptake of regenerative agriculture technologies in the dry lands of Embu County. Semi-structured questionnaires were administered to 400 farm households. Multivariate Probit model (MVP) and percentage were used to analyse the data. The findings of the study indicate that several socioeconomic factors including farming experience, farm size, main occupation, off-farm activities, age, gender, marital status and education level influenced the uptake of various regenerative agriculture technologies. Government and other inventors should take these factors into consideration while making decisions and formulating policies to support the dissemination and uptake of agricultural innovations.
10. Transforming landscapes and mindscapes through regenerative agriculture
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Contributers:
- Gordon, Ethan (author), Davila, Frederico (author), and Riedy, Chris (author)
- Format:
- Journal article
- Publication Date:
- 2021-11-02
- Published:
- Netherlands: Springer
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 209 Document Number: D13381
- Journal Title:
- Agriculture and Human Values
- Journal Title Details:
- 39 : 809-826
- Notes:
- 18 pages, Agriculture occupies 38% of the planet’s terrestrial surface, using 70% of freshwater resources. Its modern practice is dominated by an industrial–productivist discourse, which has contributed to the simplification and degradation of human and ecological systems. As such, agricultural transformation is essential for creating more sustainable food systems. This paper focuses on discursive change. A prominent discursive alternative to industrial–productivist agriculture is regenerative agriculture. Regenerative discourses are emergent, radically evolving and diverse. It is unclear whether they have the potential to generate the changes required to shift industrial–productivist agriculture. This paper presents a literature-based discourse analysis to illustrate key thematic characteristics of regenerative agricultural discourses. The analysis finds that such discourses: situate agricultural work within nested, complex living systems; position farms as relational, characterised by co-evolution between humans and other landscape biota; perceive the innate potential of living systems as place-sourced; maintain a transformative openness to alternative thinking and practice; believe that multiple regenerative cultures are necessary for deeply regenerative agriculture; and depart from industrialism to varying degrees. The paper concludes by reviewing three transformative opportunities for regenerative discourses—discourse coalitions, translocal organising and collective learning.