USA: University Press of America, Lanham, Maryland.
Location:
Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Document Number: D02874
Notes:
230 pages., Documents ready-print services (sometimes known as patent insides)that furnished newspapers printed on one side, or on two or more pages, to subscribing publishers. Estimated in 1912 to reach 60 million readers in the U.S. Author explores what was being written in those newspapers, and by whom.
Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 198 Document Number: D09695
Notes:
Delmar Hatesohl Collection. Full thesis is located in the University of Missouri Depository. Call number: 378.7 M71 XB3395, Chapter II (pages 10-39)in this thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of a Master of Arts degree, University of Missouri, Columbia. 182 pages.
Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 49 Document Number: D10720
Notes:
Claude W. Gifford Collection. Beyond his materials in the ACDC collection, the Claude W. Gifford Papers, 1919-2004, are deposited in the University of Illinois Archives. Serial Number 8/3/81. Locate finding aid at https://archives.library.illinois.edu/archon/, 2 pages.
Hayden, Victor F. (author), Jenkins, Charles J. (author), and Agricultural Publishers Association, Chicago, Illinois.
Format:
Report
Publication Date:
1925-07-29
Published:
USA
Location:
Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Document Number: C36764
Notes:
Agricultural Publishers Association Records, Series No. 8/3/80, Box 7, 22 pages., Testimony on second-class mail before the Special Joint Sub-Committee on Postal Rates of the Senate and House of Representatives, Washington, D.C.
Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Document Number: C36830
Notes:
Agricultural Publishers Association Records, Series No. 8/3/80, Box 11, Page 1 of Bulletin No. 47-B., APA responds to criticism about the value and public expense of rural free delivery of mail..
