Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 149 Document Number: D06713
Notes:
Three additional brief news reports about formation of ENAJ accompany this article. Website address of ENAJ is provided: http://www.Ag-PRESS.eu., Online via website of the British Guild of Agricultural Journalists. 1 page.
Frank, W. (author / EEC, Brussels) and EEC, Brussels
Format:
Conference paper
Publication Date:
1982
Published:
International
Location:
Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 54 Document Number: C00987
Notes:
In: Hanf, C-H; Schiefer, G.W. eds., Decision and information in agribusiness : proceedings of the Third Symposium of the European Association of Agricultural Economics. Kiel : Kieler Wissenschaftsverlag Vauk, 1982: 305-314
Hagspiel, Doris (author), Bell, Carola (author), and Bruce, Alicia (author)
Format:
Report
Publication Date:
1997-04
Published:
International
Location:
Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Document Number: D00785
Notes:
Case study report at the leader seminar, "Challenges and methodology of transnational cooperation," Dieulefit (Drome), France, April 2-6, 1997. Via Rural Europe online. 3 pages.
20 pages, via online journal, Purpose: This paper demystifies the processes, methodologies and outputs of three co-design projects, identifying how and to what extent are aims and principles of the multi-actor approach realised and upheld in the field. Implications from the cases for participatory principles are discussed.
Design/Methodology/approach: A detailed ethnographic account is presented of three multi-actor co-design cases, supporting diverse readers’ interpretations and learnings.
Findings: Three paradoxes were identifiable from the multi-actor processes: (1) outputs can be orphaned when they lack strong identifiers and affiliations with discrete professional communities outside of the co-design team; (2) combining diverse knowledges co-design can generate outputs that are new and strange (rather than familiar and acceptable) to end-users; (3) for Responsible Research and Innovation, co-creating interventions that are challenging (rather than popular) to society may be required.
Practical implications: Awareness of dynamics and paradoxes arising in the implementation of multi-actor co-design supports enhanced facilitation of processes and impacts of outcomes. Together, the paradoxes highlight the critical importance of communications and engagement initiatives across diverse communities in the aftermath of co-design efforts.
Theoretical implications: Although co-design processes are case-dependent, reflexive accounts of how they play out contribute to the body of knowledge of how co-design may be better understood. The cases in this paper identify paradoxes with implications for principles and theory of multi-actor co-design.
Originality/Value: This paper presents a detailed account of three unique co-design processes. Practical and theoretical implications of the cases are identified.
McGuirk, Anya M. (author), Preckel, Paul V. (author), Peterson, Everett B. (author), Van Eenoo, Edward Jr. (author), Gracia, A. (author), and Albisu, L.M. (author)
Format:
Journal article
Publication Date:
2001
Published:
International
Location:
Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Document Number: C22417
