Beus, Curtis E. (author), Dunlap, R.E. (author), and Department of Rural Sociology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA; Department of Sociology and Rural Sociology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington
Format:
Journal article
Publication Date:
1994
Published:
USA
Location:
Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 101 Document Number: C08618
Dent, J.B., eds. (author / University of Edinburgh), Austin, E.J. (author / University of Edinburgh), Deary, I.J. (author / University of Edinburgh), Gibson, G.J. (author / University of Edinburgh), and McGregor, M.J. (author / Scottish Agricultural College)
Format:
Journal article
Publication Date:
1996
Published:
USA
Location:
Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 104 Document Number: C09011
Jenkins, David R. (author), Matthews, M. Taylor (author), Sletto, Raymond F. (author), and South Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station; South Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station; South Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station
Format:
Report
Publication Date:
1942
Published:
USA
Location:
Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 44 Document Number: B05353
Title page, table of contents, introduction, summary, Clemson, South Carolina : South Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station of Clemson Agricultural College, 1942. 39 p. (Bulletin no. 339)
AGRICOLA AGE 85926146, Extract: The study examines evaluations of recent life experience in farming and expectations for life quality in the future as a function of farm structural characteristics and selected individual attributes. Based on a random sample of farm operators, the two sets of variables are used to predict subjective well-being within farm size categories. The results show that individual characteristics tended to be more important determinants of well- being than were farm structure dimensions. farm size and income measures had minor effects on self-ratings of well-being. Under controls, off-farm work status was not related to well-being. The determinants of well-being were particularly difficult to specify among large-farm operators.
