1 - 4 of 4
Number of results to display per page
Search Results
2. Defogging climate change communication: how cognitive research can promote effective climate communication
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Contributers:
- Amelung, Dorothee (author), Fischer, Helen (author), Kruse, Lenelis (author), Sauerborn, Rainer (author), and Department of Psychology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany Climate Change and Health Working Group, Institue of Public Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany Claremont Graduate University, USA
- Format:
- Journal article
- Publication Date:
- 2016-08-31
- Published:
- Switzerland: Frontiers Media
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 164 Document Number: D08300
- Journal Title:
- Frontiers in Psychology
- Journal Title Details:
- 7:1-4
3. Eco-efficiency among dairy farmers: the importance of socio-economic characteristics and farmer attitudes
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Contributers:
- Urdiales, Maria Perez (author), Lansink, Alfons Oude (author), and Wall, Alan (author)
- Format:
- Journal article
- Publication Date:
- 2016
- Published:
- Spain: Springer
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Document Number: D10186
- Journal Title:
- Environmental Resource Economics
- Journal Title Details:
- 64(4): 559-574
- Notes:
- pgs. 559–574, Via online journal, The aim of this paper is to assess the eco-efficiency of dairy farms in Spain. To do so, we use data from a survey carried out in 2010 for the specific purpose of analysing the environmental performance of 50 dairy farms in the Spanish region of Asturias. The survey contains information on nutrients balances and greenhouse gas emissions which is used to calculate environmental pressure indicators. Eco-efficiency is measured using data envelopment analysis. We analyse the influence of farmers’ socio-economic characteristics and attitudes in explaining these eco-efficiency scores using truncated regression and bootstrapping procedures. On average, the dairy farms are found to be highly eco-inefficient. Among our results, farmers that are younger, that plan to continue in operation in the foreseeable future and that participate more in training schemes are found to be more eco-efficient. Self-reported positive environmental habits are also reflected in actual eco-efficient performance. We quantify these potential gains in eco-efficiency through a simulation analysis based on the estimated model’s coefficients.
4. Natural versus anthropogenic climate change: Swedish farmers’ joint construction of climate perceptions
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Contributers:
- Asplund, Therese (author)
- Format:
- Online journal article
- Publication Date:
- 2016
- Published:
- SAGE Journals
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 32 Document Number: D10596
- Journal Title:
- Public Understanding of Science
- Journal Title Details:
- 25(5), 560–575
- Notes:
- 16 pages., via online journal., While previous research into understandings of climate change has usually examined general public perceptions, this study offers an audience-specific departure point. This article analyses how Swedish farmers perceive climate change and how they jointly shape their understandings. The agricultural sector is of special interest because it both contributes to and is directly affected by climate change. Through focus group discussions with Swedish farmers, this study finds that (1) farmers relate to and understand climate change through their own experiences, (2) climate change is understood either as a natural process subject to little or no human influence or as anthropogenic and (3) various communication tools contribute to the formation of natural and anthropogenic climate change frames. The article ends by discussing frame resonance and frame clash in public understanding of climate change and by comparing potential similarities and differences in how various segments of the public make sense of climate change.