Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 196 Document Number: D08037
Notes:
John L. Woods Collection, Involves the Retail Water Distribution Project (RWDP). Prepared by Chemonics International, Inc., Washington, D. C., in association with Argil, Ltd. Institute for Public-Private Partnership. Funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, D. C. Includes strategy, KAP survey findings, action plans, and initial trip report. 51 pages.
Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Document Number: C29916
Notes:
Pages 131-148 in Richard Holliman, Jeff Thomas, Sam Smidt, Eileen Scanlon and Elizabeth Whitelegg (eds.), Practising science communication in the information age: theorizing professional practices. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England. 238 pages.
Hayden, Victor F. (author) and Agricultural Publishers Association, Chicago, Illinois.
Format:
Report
Publication Date:
1937-10-20
Published:
USA
Location:
Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Document Number: C36859
Notes:
Agricultural Publishers Association Records, Series No. 8/3/80, Box 13, Pages 5-6 of Executive Secretary's annual report for the period ending September 30, 1937., Offers examples of cases during the period when APA negotiated with advertisers about copy they wished to run.
USA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
Location:
Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 69 Document Number: D10770
Notes:
See this report in Document C02958. Claude W. Gifford Collection. Beyond his materials in the ACDC collection, the Claude W. Gifford Papers, 1919-2004, are deposited in the University of Illinois Archives. Serial Number 8/3/81. Locate finding aid at https://archives.library.illinois.edu/archon/, Pages 45-46 in Biotechnology: the challenge - proceedings of the USDA Biotechnology Challenge Forum, Washington, D.C., February 5-6, 1987. 56 pages.
This study examined an organizations’ crisis communication strategy (i.e., crisis response strategy and technical translation strategy) on social media and publics’ cognitive and affective responses. Twenty crisis communication messages posted by Foster Farms regarding a salmonella outbreak and 349 public responses were analyzed. The results showed that a technical translation strategy generated more public acceptances of message and more positive emotions than a crisis response strategy. A crisis response strategy generated more public rejections of message and more negative emotions than a technical translation strategy.
