1 - 5 of 5
Number of results to display per page
Search Results
2. Bioethics symposium: the ethical food movement: What does it mean for the role of science and scientists in current debates about animal agriculture?
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Contributers:
- Croney, C.C. (author), Apley, M. (author), Capper, J.L. (author), Mench, J.A. (author), Priest, S. (author), and Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907 Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506 Department of Animal Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman 99164 Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis 95616 Department of Communication, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030
- Format:
- Journal article
- Publication Date:
- 2015-01-20
- Published:
- USA: American Society of Animal Science
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 164 Document Number: D08306
- Journal Title:
- Journal of Animal Science
- Journal Title Details:
- 90 (5): 1570-1582
3. Consumer attitude and behaviour towards food waste
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Contributers:
- Radzyminska, Monika (author), Jakubowska, Dominika (author), and Staniewska, Katarzyna (author)
- Format:
- Journal article
- Publication Date:
- 2016
- Published:
- Poland
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 102 Document Number: D10926
- Journal Title:
- Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development
- Journal Title Details:
- 1(39) : 175-181
- Notes:
- This paper presents the attitudes and behaviour of young consumers towards food waste based on a pilot qualitative research and data published in the literature. Qualitative research was conducted with the use of focus group method, with approximately 8–10 selected students per group. Four focus group sessions were held, with open discussion led by a moderator and the scenario containing problematic issues. The study included a total of thirty-seven students, aged 22– 25 years. Studies have shown that negative attitude of household towards food waste is not frequently reflected in consumers’ behaviour, despite their fundamental knowledge on how to reduce food waste. Respondents emphasized the need for educational campaigns. Properly selected and presented information will stimulate both consumer’s attitude and behaviour.
4. Consumer expectations high for sustainability
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Contributers:
- Karst, Tom (author)
- Format:
- Research summary
- Publication Date:
- 2020-12-17
- Published:
- USA
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 202 Document Number: D11995
- Journal Title:
- Packer
- Notes:
- Online via subscription. 5 pages., Review of results of survey research among U.S. consumers by Aimpoint Research for The Packer.
5. Farmers prevailing perception profiles regarding GM crops: a classification proposal
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Contributers:
- Almeida, Carla (author) and Massarani, Luisa (author)
- Format:
- Online journal article
- Publication Date:
- 2018
- Published:
- SAGE Journals
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 32 Document Number: D10598
- Journal Title:
- Public Understanding of Science
- Journal Title Details:
- 27(8), 952–966
- Notes:
- 15 pages., via online journal., Genetically modified organisms have been at the centre of a major public controversy, involving different interests and actors. While much attention has been devoted to consumer views on genetically modified food, there have been few attempts to understand the perceptions of genetically modified technology among farmers. By investigating perceptions of genetically modified organisms among Brazilian farmers, we intend to contribute towards filling this gap and thereby add the views of this stakeholder group to the genetically modified debate. A comparative analysis of our data and data from other studies indicate there is a complex variety of views on genetically modified organisms among farmers. Despite this diversity, we found variations in such views occur within limited parameters, concerned principally with expectations or concrete experiences regarding the advantages of genetically modified crops, perceptions of risks associated with them, and ethical questions they raise. We then propose a classification of prevailing profiles to represent the spectrum of perceptions of genetically modified organisms among farmers.