1 - 4 of 4
Number of results to display per page
Search Results
2. Examining ethical typologies of agriculture and natural resources leaders: A Q Study
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Contributers:
- Giles, Michelle R. (author), Nash, Taylor (author), Greenhaw, Laura L. (author), Rampold, Shelli D. (author), and Hurdle, J. Clay (author)
- Format:
- Journal article
- Publication Date:
- 2022
- Published:
- USA: American Association for Agricultural Education
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 205 Document Number: D12671
- Journal Title:
- Journal of Agricultural Education
- Journal Title Details:
- Vol. 63, N. 3
- Notes:
- 17 pages, This study sought to describe agriculture and natural resources (ANR) opinion leaders’ ethical orientations by illuminating how they determine what is right/wrong or good/bad when making decisions that impact the ANR industry. ANR leaders’ ethical perspectives impact decisions regarding complex critical issues and influence others’ behavior. We used Q methodology, and four typologies were revealed, including Principled, Industry-focused, Dutiful, and Multi-Hat Leaders. The methodological approach of Q methodology to identify common ethical perspectives among ANR leaders is unique. Leadership development practitioners and educators should encourage leaders to reflect on and be cognizant of their ethical beliefs, particularly when making high-stakes decisions with far-reaching implications and when representing others as industry leaders. Though each typology characterized was unique, they all relied on a combination of ethical perspectives to guide their decision making. This may be evidence of Kohlberg’s postconventional morality as leaders’ attempt to reconcile a multitude of perspectives while seeking solutions to complex problems. Ensuring ethical approaches to food and fiber production and consumption simultaneously with care for and preservation of natural resources begins with a clear understanding of leaders’ existing ethical perspectives.
3. The honest broker: making sense of science in policy and politics
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Contributers:
- Pielke, Roger A., Jr. (author)
- Format:
- Book
- Publication Date:
- 2007
- Published:
- International: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Document Number: D09728
- Notes:
- 188 pages, Explores options for scientists to consider in making their own judgments about how they would like to position themselves in relation to policy and politics.
4. Which socio-economic indicators influence collective morality? Big data analysis on online Chinese social media
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Contributers:
- Zhang, Yu (author) and Yu, Feng (author)
- Format:
- Journal article abstract
- Publication Date:
- 2018-02-06
- Published:
- China
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 198 Document Number: D09652
- Journal Title:
- Emerging Markets Finance and Trade
- Journal Title Details:
- 54(4) : 792-800
- Notes:
- Analysis of an online social microblog, Sina Weibo. Researchers found that "the poor and rich areas were more willing to behave immorally, and the relation between GDP and collective moral motivation was curved. Also, normal people were less ethical when prices increased than when incomes decreased. Ecological construction and the value added by industries which used more farmers and off-farm workers were both correlated with morality. We also found a dark side to science and technological innovation, which harmed collective morality when areas grew richer."