Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Document Number: C29954
Notes:
Posted at http://agnews.tamu.edu/saas/2009/irlbeck.pdf, Presented to the Agricultural Communications Section, Southern Association of Agricultural Scientists, Atlanta, Georgia, January 31-February 3, 2009. 19 pages.
Ziegler, Anna (author), Jamison, Angela Bendorf (author), Keller,Des (author), and Evans, Jim (author)
Format:
Case study
Publication Date:
2010-07
Published:
USA: American Agricultural Editors' Association, New Prague, Minnesota.
Location:
Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 146 Document Number: D06613
Notes:
Two-page introduction and 13 case studies (26 pages). Prepared by the lead author in cooperation with the AAEA Affiliate Advisory Committee., Case studies written to illustrate the values and principles identified in the AAEA Affiliate Code of Ethics. Each study outlines a hypothetical situation involving an ethical dilemma that an agricultural communications professional might encounter and poses six discussion questions. The discussion guide offers suggested answers and discussion topics. These case studies are used in conjunction with the Affiliate Code of Ethics and are intended to offer practice in recognizing, discussing and resolving ethical dilemmas.
Johnsrud, M. (author / USDA Extension) and USDA Extension
Format:
Conference paper
Publication Date:
1987
Published:
USA
Location:
Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 63 Document Number: C02133
Notes:
James F. Evans Collection; Two copies, In: Extension Technology Conference, April 27-30, 1987, selected presentations. Washington, D.C. : U.S. Department of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension System, 1987. 22 p.
Via online. 28 pages., Involves Facebook responses of local chapters of the National FFA Organization involving a 2017 wildfire devastation in Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas. Author's analysis of 23 public posts led to an observation that the FFA chapter posts contained embedded traditional rural literacies and insular narrative. Observed failure to capitalize on Facebook's potential as an advocacy tool to inform and engage large public audiences.
16 pages., Online via UI e-subscription, Using fieldwork and in-depth-interviews with key informants, researchers examined how two groups (landowner group and citizen group) framed their arguments involving proposed sale of water from this aquifer. The citizen group was found more articulate in opposing the sale of water to the broader public. Findings also suggested that the framing strategies used by both groups served to escalate community dissension and therefore limit opportunities for resolution.
Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 161 Document Number: D07874
Notes:
Pages 99-102 in M.J. Navarro (ed.), Voices and views: why biotech? ISAAA Brief No. 50. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications, Ithaca, New York. 158 pages.
Rockwood, Walter G. (author / Communications and Information International Institute of Tropical Agriculture Ibadan, Nigeria)
Format:
Speech
Publication Date:
1971-07-05
Published:
USA
Location:
Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 177 Document Number: C30380
Notes:
Speech prepared to set stage for a seminar on learning and communication for 20 overseas students enrolled in soils programs at American Universities, University of Illinois
Available online at www.centmapress.org, Four factors and three farmer groups were identified which significantly differed regarding their attitudes towards animal welfare programs and willingness to participate in them. Authors cited evidence of need to design tailor-made strategies for communicating with farmers about this subject.
