Search

    Start Over Publication Year 2000 Subject Term attitudes Subject Term consumer attitudes Subject Term public attitudes

    2. Animal care ethics, ANZCCART, and public perceptions of animal use ethics

    <span class="translation_missing" title="translation missing: en.bibleaves.discover_item">Discover Item</span>
    Collection:
    Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
    Contributers:
    Morris, Michael (author)
    Format:
    Journal article
    Publication Date:
    2000-09
    Published:
    International
    Location:
    Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Document Number: C25203
    Journal Title:
    Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics
    Journal Title Details:
    13(3/4) : 249-257
    Notes:
    Results of a survey among participants in a conference of the Australian and New Zealand Council for the Care of Animals in Research and Teaching (ANZCCART).

    3. Consumer perception of food products involving genetic modification: Results from a qualitative study in four Nordic countries

    <span class="translation_missing" title="translation missing: en.bibleaves.discover_item">Discover Item</span>
    Collection:
    Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
    Contributers:
    Ueland, Oydis (author), Lahteenmaki, Liisa (author), Grunert, Klaus G. (author), Nielsen, Niels A. (author), Poulson, Jacob B. (author), Astrom, Annika (author), and The MAPP Centre, Aarhus School of Business, Denmark.
    Format:
    Abstract
    Publication Date:
    2000-07
    Published:
    International
    Location:
    Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 165 Document Number: C27552
    Notes:
    MAPP Working Paper Number 72., Abstract of a 105-page research report.

    5. Many Americans falsely optimistic about their diets

    <span class="translation_missing" title="translation missing: en.bibleaves.discover_item">Discover Item</span>
    Collection:
    Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
    Contributers:
    Shim, Young (author), Blaylock, James (author), and Variyam, J.N. (author)
    Format:
    Journal article
    Publication Date:
    2000
    Published:
    USA: Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
    Location:
    Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Document Number: C25248
    Journal Title:
    FoodReview
    Journal Title Details:
    23(1) : 44-50

    6. The future relationship between the media, the food industry and the consumer

    <span class="translation_missing" title="translation missing: en.bibleaves.discover_item">Discover Item</span>
    Collection:
    Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
    Contributers:
    Anderson, W.A. (author)
    Format:
    Journal article
    Publication Date:
    2000
    Published:
    International
    Location:
    Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 145 Document Number: C22647
    Journal Title:
    British Medical Bulletin
    Journal Title Details:
    56(1) : 254-268
    Notes:
    Author examines some of the forces that have led to a relationship that "is probably at its lowest point as we start the new millennium."

    8. U.S. public opinion of the honesty and ethical standards of farmers

    <span class="translation_missing" title="translation missing: en.bibleaves.discover_item">Discover Item</span>
    Collection:
    Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
    Format:
    Survey report result
    Publication Date:
    2000-06
    Published:
    USA
    Location:
    Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 198 Document Number: D09662
    Notes:
    Results of a survey question in the Fox News/Opinion Dynamics Poll, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (producer). Results obtained from Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, iPOLL,accessed June 27, 2018. 2 pages., Poll results - respondent rating of farmers in terms of honesty and ethical standards: Very high: 22% High: 48% Average: 24% Low: 3% Don't know: 3%