Fliegel, Frederick C. (author), Kivlin, Joseph E. (author), Sekhon, Gurmeet S. (author), and Fliegel: Department of Agricultural Economics and Sociology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Kivlin: Department of Sociology, Bowling Green State University, Ohio; Sekhon: Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Social Work, Indiana State University, Terre Haute
Format:
Journal article
Publication Date:
1971
Location:
Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 11 Document Number: B01452
Dufour, A. (author), Mauz, I. (author), Remy, J. (author), Bernard, C. (author), Dobremez, L. (author), Havet, A. (author), Pauthenet, Y. (author), Pluvinage, J. (author), and Tchakerian, E. (author)
Format:
Journal article
Publication Date:
2007-10
Published:
USA: Blackwell Publishing
Location:
Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Document Number: C26538
Examines emerging global food chains that displace local decision making and, alternatively, emerging alternatives that help localize production/consumption relationships in the food system in equitable ways.
Author reports on the complexity and inconsistencies of organic views about nature. "Even with the particular classification scheme expressed within the fish debate, the organic movement simultaneously articulated a wide variety of often contradictory views of nature-society." (p. 231)
28pgs, Technological advancement is seen as one way of sustainably intensifying agriculture. Scholars argue that innovation needs to be responsible, but it is difficult to anticipate the consequences of the ‘fourth agricultural revolution’ without a clear sense of which technologies are included and excluded. The major aims of this article were to investigate which technologies are being associated with the fourth agricultural revolution, as well as to understand how this revolution is being perceived, whether positive or negative consequences are given equal attention, and what type of impacts are anticipated. To this end, we undertook a content analysis of UK media and policy documents alongside interviews of farmers and advisers. We found that the fourth agricultural revolution is associated with emergent, game-changing technologies, at least in media and policy documents. In these sources, the benefits to productivity and the environment were prioritised with less attention to social consequences, but impacts were overwhelmingly presented positively. Farmers and advisers experienced many benefits of technologies and some predicted higher-tech futures. It was clear, however, that technologies create a number of negative consequences. We reflect on these findings and provide advice to policy-makers about how to interrogate the benefits, opportunities, and risks afforded by agricultural technologies.
