Search

    Start Over Format Commentary Subject Term reporting Subject Term risk communication

    25. Pink slime, yellow journalism and the amplification of risk

    <span class="translation_missing" title="translation missing: en.bibleaves.discover_item">Discover Item</span>
    Collection:
    Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
    Contributers:
    Powell, Doug (author)
    Format:
    Commentary
    Publication Date:
    2012-04-08
    Published:
    USA
    Location:
    Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 184 Document Number: D00191
    Notes:
    Bites-L, Food Safety Network, Kansas State University, Manhattan., On media reporting about "lean finely textured beef" as "pink slime."

    26. Putting consumers back in their place: after "pink slime" victory, reminders that corporations do know best

    <span class="translation_missing" title="translation missing: en.bibleaves.discover_item">Discover Item</span>
    Collection:
    Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
    Contributers:
    Jackson, Janine (author)
    Format:
    Commentary
    Publication Date:
    2012-08-14
    Published:
    USA
    Location:
    Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 187 Document Number: D01044
    Notes:
    Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, New York, New York. 4 pages., About media coverage of the "pink slime" scare.

    27. Read each peer review paper critically and weigh its merits

    <span class="translation_missing" title="translation missing: en.bibleaves.discover_item">Discover Item</span>
    Collection:
    Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
    Contributers:
    GM-Free Ireland Network, Wicklow, Ireland
    Format:
    Commentary
    Publication Date:
    2009-03-21
    Published:
    International
    Location:
    Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 172 Document Number: C28949
    Notes:
    1 page., A nutrition scientist criticizes the soundness of a peer reviewed journal article about genetic modification and urges an agricultural reporter to read such articles critically and weigh their merits. A response from the Network follows.