Search

    Start Over Format Commentary Subject Term food safety Subject Term meat

    23. Pink slime, yellow journalism and the amplification of risk

    <span class="translation_missing" title="translation missing: en.bibleaves.discover_item">Discover Item</span>
    Collection:
    Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
    Contributers:
    Powell, Doug (author)
    Format:
    Commentary
    Publication Date:
    2012-04-08
    Published:
    USA
    Location:
    Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 184 Document Number: D00191
    Notes:
    Bites-L, Food Safety Network, Kansas State University, Manhattan., On media reporting about "lean finely textured beef" as "pink slime."

    24. Putting consumers back in their place: after "pink slime" victory, reminders that corporations do know best

    <span class="translation_missing" title="translation missing: en.bibleaves.discover_item">Discover Item</span>
    Collection:
    Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
    Contributers:
    Jackson, Janine (author)
    Format:
    Commentary
    Publication Date:
    2012-08-14
    Published:
    USA
    Location:
    Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 187 Document Number: D01044
    Notes:
    Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, New York, New York. 4 pages., About media coverage of the "pink slime" scare.

    25. Speech on food safety is on trial

    <span class="translation_missing" title="translation missing: en.bibleaves.discover_item">Discover Item</span>
    Collection:
    Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
    Contributers:
    Collins, Ronald K.L. (author) and Center for Science in the Public Interest, Washington, D.C.
    Format:
    Commentary
    Publication Date:
    1998-02
    Published:
    USA
    Location:
    Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 151 Document Number: C24431
    Notes:
    Retrieved July 7, 2006, From the Baltimore Sun (Maryland) via CSPI. 3 pages., In the interest of First Amendment protection, author says "it is essential that existing food-disparagement laws be rejected in the courts and legislatures of this land."

    27. The high costs of free speech

    <span class="translation_missing" title="translation missing: en.bibleaves.discover_item">Discover Item</span>
    Collection:
    Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
    Contributers:
    Miraldi, Robert (author) and Center for Science in the Public Interest, Washington, D.C.
    Format:
    Commentary
    Publication Date:
    2006
    Published:
    USA
    Location:
    Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 151 Document Number: C24428
    Notes:
    Retrieved July 7, 2006, 2 pages., Comments on the high cost Oprah Winfrey incurred in defending against the defamation suit by beef interests. "When an industry can haul a speaker into court for merely discussing food safety, the result, inevitably, is silence of the next speaker."