1 - 3 of 3
Number of results to display per page
Search Results
2. Consumers' evaluation of animal welfare labels on poultry products
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Contributers:
- Powers, Rexanna (author), Li, Nan (author), and Gibson, Courtney (author)
- Format:
- Journal article
- Publication Date:
- 2020
- Published:
- USA
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 132 Document Number: D11337
- Journal Title:
- Journal of Applied Communications
- Journal Title Details:
- 104(1) Article 1
- Notes:
- Online via https://newprairiepress.org/jac, Authors identified five labels related to animal welfare that are frequently found on food packages in USA grocery stores Results of a controlled online experiment among consumers showed that while most consumers lacked knowledge regarding meaning of the labels and certification standards, they relied on the labels with simplistic terms as heuristic cues to judge the ethical treatment of hens on the farm. The selected labels did not lead consumers to pay a higher premium for the labeled products.
3. Hen housing system information effects on U.S. egg demand
- Collection:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center (ACDC)
- Contributers:
- Ochs, Dan (author), Wolf, Christopher A. (author), Widmar, Nicole Olynk (author), Bir, Courtney (author), and Lai, John (author)
- Format:
- Journal article
- Publication Date:
- 2019
- Published:
- USA
- Location:
- Agricultural Communications Documentation Center, Funk Library, University of Illinois Box: 136 Document Number: D11449
- Journal Title:
- Food Policy
- Journal Title Details:
- 87 : 101743
- Notes:
- 9 pages., Online via UI electronic subscription., A choice experiment was used to evaluate the U.S. public's willingness to pay for egg attributes including housing system, color, size, and certifying agency. A significant difference in willingness to pay for hen housing systems was found using video information treatments describing hen housing systems. Participants were indifferent between hen housing systems when they viewed video treatments describing hen housing systems. However, they clearly preferred the cage-free system when they viewed no video treatments. "Results point towards potential public misunderstanding of the costs and benefits associated with the "cage-free" egg label designation."